Home » national news » 'Hope SC is culturally sensitive while deciding on women's entry in Sabarimala'

'Hope SC is culturally sensitive while deciding on women's entry in Sabarimala'

Somi Das | Updated on: 14 February 2017, 5:14 IST

The Supreme Court today, questioned the right of the Sabarimala Temple to bar women between the age groups of 10-50 from entering the temple premises.

Hearing a petition filed by the Indian Young Lawyers Association, the apex court told the Travancore Devaswom Board, which manages the Sabarimala Temple, that it has no constitutional authority to stop women from entering the temple. Although a final verdict on the case is awaited, the Court's observation has sparked off some divided and stark opinions on the issue.

Social media was abuzz with varied opinions on the issue. Many held the view that the the Court's observation would go a long way in ensuring gender justice and in ending menstruation taboos. Traditionally, women are not allowed to enter temple premises while they menstruating.

But for others, it was a matter of religious freedom for devotees of the Lord Ayappa, who is the residing deity of the temple.


We spoke to Rahul Eashwar, the grandson of Kandararu Maheshwararu, senior supreme priest of Sabarimala, the hill shrine of Lord Ayappa, to understand why the temple authorities have continued with the practice which is considered regressive and anti-women.

What is the background of the case?

Around eight years back there was a controversy regarding Srimati Jayamala where she had claimed that she touched the Lord Ayyappa idol in Sabarimala. Barkha Dutt then wrote an article on it in Hindustan Times which later became the basis of this case. These are the facts of the case.

How do you justify the ban on a woman's entry?

It has been a traction there for thousand of years. Our point is simple. There is a difference between differentiation and discrimination. There is no discrimination in not letting women inside Sabarimala temple. Thousands of women visit Sabarimala every year. Only women between 10-50 years are not allowed. Every temple is based on a unique concept.

Second, the major concept of the temple is brahmacharya or celibacy. That's the main reason why women are not allowed.

Third and the last point is that whenever there has been a clash between Article 40 and Article 25, right to religion and right to equality, Supreme Court has always sided with Article 25 as a superficial argument of differentiation cannot be reason enough to curtail someone's right to religion.

But don't you think by banning women, you are infringing upon a woman's right to religion?

No. I can counter that. Doesn't it infringe upon my right to be not able to participate in Pongala festival in which only women can participate and not men. There is nari puja there. Can I go and participate there?

What if the Supreme Court rules against you and allows the entry of women in Sabarimala?

I hope the Supreme Court will be culturally sensitive.

First published: 11 January 2016, 10:01 IST
Somi Das @Somi_Das

Somi brings with her the diverse experience of working in a hard news environment with ample exposure to long-form journalism to Catch. She has worked with Yahoo! News, India Legal and Newslaundry. As the Assistant Editor of Catch Live, she intends to bring quality, speed and accuracy to the table. She has a PGD in Print and TV journalism from YMCA, New Delhi, and is a lifelong student of Political Science.