Home » Bollywood News » Kaafiron Ki Namaaz movie review : Theatre Of The Insufferable

Kaafiron Ki Namaaz movie review : Theatre Of The Insufferable

Rahul Desai | Updated on: 10 February 2017, 1:51 IST
    One war-torn town, three men, one table, many conversations
    Released digitally on YouTube on 7th April, 2016
    Best Film winner at Ladakh International Film Festival
    Rating: 1.5 stars

I can understand why Kashmir - that of eternal conflict and beauty, irony and epiphany - is overly poeticized by storytellers. Gorgeous whispers, cold filters and heavy metaphors have over the years lent an unreal mysticism to the region. But frankly, no film or piece of literature can truly encapsulate the reality of forever waking up on the cusp of heaven and hell. Movies often stretch the land to accommodate opinions, protests, ideals and fierce theories of onlookers who have little idea about the volatility of human nature in strife. 

Kaafiron Ki Namaaz is one such piece of work; it looks to have been made by angst-ridden young minds intent on exploring themselves instead of the medium they've chosen. In the process, what we get is - to put it crudely - a 140-minute long gabfest between two, occasionally three, pretentious men at a table in an abandoned Srinagar hotel on Christmas Eve. The setting sounds intriguing, but that's all there is to it.

A Bengali writer (Chandrahas Tiwari) interviews an eccentric court-martialed army man (Alok Chaturvedi) for his new book. A cameraman, who is also narrating this incident to us in that typically annoying lyrical manner, records their interminable conversation. Throw in a tea-selling failed musician and a radio voice reading out confession letters at this ungodly hour, and we get a film that I don’t care to understand.

It all starts with how staged and deliberately dense everything feels - from the title to the performances to the artful frames, precise lighting and production design. I suppose it's meant to be a battle of egos and ethics and some bizarre journey of internal purification, but the characters instead appear witless, random and worrying unstable. Their abrupt stream-of-consciousness exchange stems from the filmmaker's own eagerness to put forth his views and ponderings about everything from Gandhi to war to sex to death. This soon crosses into the nothing-must-make-sense-to-make-sense zone.

The writer is exceedingly whiny, his eyes always popping out with rage for no fathomable reason, his line of questioning resembling that of five-year old brat with daddy issues. There were times I just wanted him to be shot and done away with. It doesn't help matters that they switch from Hindi to English - which isn't even their comfortable language - for no real reason, and truly sound like they’re playing out someone else’s existential crisis.

The army chap, who feeds off the writer's frenzy initially, becomes equally insecure and vulnerable by the thousandth minute. The role-reversal is clear; any one of them is chain-smoking, drinking tea and acting like a sociopath at any point of time. Soon, one is doing yoga, the other weeping copiously and the third is doing a bit of both - just another day in the universe of Kaafiron Ki Namaaz.

After the film, when a colleague asked me what the initial scenes of a boy opening a window were about, I wondered if he was messing with me. On deeper thought, I remembered this vague opening scene - now a hazy memory numbed by the barrage of nothingness that followed. It felt like years ago, like reminiscing about a long-buried childhood incident.

This film comes across as the kind of verbose play or minimalist painting designed to be incomprehensible enough to attract applause from unsuspecting purists. But that doesn't automatically mean it's clever. Not my cup of kahwa, this.

First published: 7 April 2016, 4:38 IST
Rahul Desai @ReelReptile

Rahul Desai is a full-time Federer enthusiast and avid traveller who absolutely must find a way to reach Europe once a year. In his spare time, he reviews films, aspires to own a swimming pool and whines about the lack of palatable food in Mumbai.