Home » Politics » #BiharResults: 10 factors on which Bihar voted
 

#BiharResults: 10 factors on which Bihar voted

Panini Anand | Updated on: 13 February 2017, 8:12 IST
01
Bihari vs Bahari

NDA's campaign centred around Narendra Modi and Amit Shah. The BJP failed to project any Bihari face, and Nitish Kumar was quick to turn it into a Bihari vs Bahari (outsider) issue.

02
Reservation vs anti-reservation

From RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat's comment about reviewing the reservation policy to a deep divide between 'forward' and 'backward' castes, this election revolved around the quota. In the last phase, the BJP tried changing the narrative to Backwards vs Muslim, saying that Nitish and Lalu Prasad want to give Muslims reservaton by taking it away from existing beneficiaries.

Read: Congratulations Nitish Kumar! But here's what we'll be watching you for.

03
DNA vs NDA

Modi's statement about Nitish's DNA was propagated by the Grand Alliance as an insult to Biharis. The comment was embarrassing for the NDA and its leaders kept clarifying this comment through out the campaign.

04
Performance vs promise

People who said they would vote for the NDA also agreed that Nitish has delivered on his promises in these 10 years. On the other hand, Narendra Modi's promises were judged on the merits of his performance in office.

05
Forward vs Backward

The upper caste consolidation in NDA's favour was clear and this made OBCs, especially Yadavs, consolidate behind the Grand Alliance.

06
Modi vs Nitish

Both wore development on their seats. But Nitish kept his tone sober while Modi got personal, aggressive. His speeches were perceived to be below the dignity of the PM's office.

07
Centre vs state

Modi and his cabinet colleagues and BJP's national leaders campaigned in Bihar. The NDA seemed to believe in 'give and take': Give support in the state and get support from the Centre. This was repeated by NDA leaders, including the PM. Nitish, on the other hand, campaigned on state issues. He propagated his performance and promised more for different sections of the society.

Also read: #BiharResults: what Nitish-Lalu victory means. And why it matters beyond Bihar

08
Secular vs communal

From beef to celebrations in Pakistan, BJP tried to polarise the voter in the last two phases. On the other side, the Mahagathbandhan asked people to vote for communal harmony and against the hatred. The Dadri lynching and other incidents of intolerance were also key elements in this election.

09
Jungleraj vs Mandalraj

Modi attacked the Grand Alliance for taking Lalu on board and talked about the fear of jungleraj returning. On the other side, Lalu said this is the upper caste and RSS conspiracy to take away the reservation from the backwards. Nitish also reacted to the PM by saying that we, JDU and RJD are together running the government in the state and there is no jungleraj here.

10
Stability

This was another issue that Modi and the NDA raised. They said Grand Alliance is an unnatural alliance and the happy marriage is not possible between the both. They asked people to vote for NDA for a stable government in the state. It was indeed a widely discussed issue among the voters but Nitish reacted with the 18 months old alliance with the RJD in the state.

More in Catch:

Orange is the New Black: 4 reasons Baba Ramdev deserves the Nobel Prize!

This insane video shows why Olivier Rousteing is the king of fashion today

First published: 8 November 2015, 2:41 IST
 
Panini Anand @paninianand

Senior Assistant Editor at Catch, Panini is a poet, singer, cook, painter, commentator, traveller and photographer who has worked as reporter, producer and editor for organizations including BBC, Outlook and Rajya Sabha TV. An IIMC-New Delhi alumni who comes from Rae Bareli of UP, Panini is fond of the Ghats of Varanasi, Hindustani classical music, Awadhi biryani, Bob Marley and Pink Floyd, political talks and heritage walks. He has closely observed the mainstream national political parties, the Hindi belt politics along with many mass movements and campaigns in last two decades. He has experimented with many mass mediums: theatre, street plays and slum-based tabloids, wallpapers to online, TV, radio, photography and print.